I was going to just continue with my series of getting things in order, but since this happened today (Tuesday – even though the post is queued for posting Wednesday morning), I thought I would relate the story and reschedule the other post for either later today or tomorrow.
For those of you who are not in the US, it may come as quite a shock to be introduced to the rather primitive, feudal system that serves as the mobile or cellular phone companies. Other than a handful of regional companies that service individual states or groups of state, there are four major companies, down from six when I got here in 2002. The four are AT&T Wireless, Sprint, T-Mobile and Verizon. Since my arrival, I have seen Deutsche Telekom buy and rebrand VoiceStream as T-Mobile, AT&T be bought out and then buy out Cingular and Sprint buy out Nextel.
AT&T and T-Mobile service is provided on US-specific frequencies of GSM, Sprint and Verizon use CDMA. While in most countries, four companies would be extensive competition, the lack of standardization on a single wireless standard means essentially the average person trying to purchase cellular has only set of choices: AT&T and T-Mobile can be used interchangeably, with all the caveats of phone locking that hinder interoperability of devices in the rest of the world. Theoretically one could use a Sprint phone on a Verizon network and vice versa – but I have yet to see this happen. Thus in order to switch networks, one must generally purchase phones, unless you’re lucky enough to have your unlocked phone and open phone. I have yet to see an unlocked CDMA phone, but most GSM phones can be unlocked. Unwilling to be stuck in a SIM lock trap, I have since 2004, kept my own unlocked phone – currently a Nokia N80 internet edition. I’m quite fond of it in the way you’d be fond of an old Lada.
However, I have been over the years, systematically frustrated with my carrier, T-Mobile. At least once every six months, if not more often, T-Mobile sends a nasty letter claiming non-payment, and immediate termination or suspension of service. Of course, this is clearly the best way to treat a long-term loyal customer. Every time I get such a letter, I have the pleasure of calling T-Mobile, faxing over a copy of my bank statement showing that I have in fact paid their bloody bill on time (in fact, usually well ahead of time) and thus the problem is on their end. Begrudgingly, they accept the fact (that yet again) this time they were wrong and after telling me off about my poor billing habits, we hang up. I should also take a minute here to mention that despite requesting e-billing for just a tad over a year and being told it has been activated, I have yet to get a single e-statement.
So when I got this sort of suspension of service letter from the slum-lord style management that T-Mobile is yesterday, three years to the week I setup automatic payment, I had had enough. I called them, was told their headquarters was underwater, yelled at them until I was put through, and had the problem cleared up. Then I mentioned the phrase that all American companies despise: “What is the procedure to cancel service?”
American companies, particularly American utility and telecom companies, are like the immature brats next door: when things are going in their favour, they happily laugh and run off with your money; it’s only when the threat that “their” precious money is threatened that they start whining and pleading for you to stay. Of course, you have no say in the matter – in a country where your sole consumer protection right is to complain to a bureau that has no enforcement power and takes the statement of the company to be more truthful than the that of the consumer even when the company is caught lying publically, you can hardly expect the contracts to be written fairly. This is particularly chafing because my preference is for a prepaid system, but the US mobile phone industry is setup to essentially give you postpaid or nothing. Since my cell phone is my sole phone, nothing is not an option. Neither, really, is T-Mobile. Along with binding arbitration, false marketing and tacked on fees, you could get these wonderful letters by using an American mobile phone service. Seriously, would you accept this if you went to buy groceries and at the end of the bill discovered “Government Compliance Fee” or “State Regulatory Fees” or “Capital Expense Deference Fee”?
So I decided I would go investigate my options. It was out of the question that I would switch to a CDMA provider, seeing as they use a specific, SIM-less version of phones, forcing me purchase a newer, lesser phone. But I decided to check anyway. Given my familiarity with Nokia phones, both Series 40 and S60, I thought I would check Sprint and Verizon’s Nokia offerings. Sprint offered precisely no Nokia phones; Verizon offered none online, and one hoary old clamshell with a bulging antenna in store. I went to look at it and was horrified at the menuing system. The Series 40 platform is a very well thought out, very well designed and fast platform. Instead of being greeted with that welcoming interface, I found myself trapped in a nightmare of slow inconsistent tabbed chaos, squinting at the screen to make sense of the mess of icons and kludgy text. I asked the hovering sales clerk what on earth I was looking at and was told that this mess was the happy end product of years of customizations that ensured – and I quote – “a pleasing and consistent appearance across the entire Verizon lineup”. Pleasing? No. Consistent? After checking several other phones and finding nothing similar in the layout, but otherwise identical messes, I would have to say no.
Disappointed I went to my last “choice”, the GSM-happy, SIM-friendly, N80-compatible AT&T. We talked through the various concerns I had: I needed the minimum number of minutes ($40 for 450, versus $40 for the 1000 now), about 200 text messages (I’m paying $3 for 400 any type of messages now, they offered me a $5 200 text messages only plan), and unlimited data ($20). So for $5 more than I would be paying on T-Mobile + made-up fees and taxes, I found I could get a plan with 550 fewer minutes, no unlimited nights and weekends, 200 fewer text messages, no picture messages, and no WiFi access. Awesome! Sign me up. After completing the preliminaries and making sure that both I and the confused gentleman trying to push something called a “MOTO RAZR” understood what was going on, we got to the long list of terms and conditions. Unlike most people, I read the fine print. As I learnt from the Eighth Rule of Acquisition, “small print leads to large risk”.
Therein, I discovered a problem. There was an early termination fee of a mind-boggling $175. Are you joking? After several calls up and down the chain, it was determined that despite the fact that I would be providing my own equipment, despite the fact that I would be paying the full rate plan that includes paying back the subsidy in monthly installments and despite the law saying otherwise in the great Commonwealth of Virginia, corporate policy trumps law and I would pay $175 for the privilege of canceling my service with them, despite not getting equipment for them, which is the purpose of the fee. You can imagine what my reaction was. Despite the protests of the gentleman trying to sell me on these feudal terms, I ripped up the contract and walked out of the store, with the store manager threatening to call the cops on me for taking back a form I had filled up with my information. Naturally, no cops showed up, but I think it illustrates precisely how these phone companies think of you, their customer.
So as I sit here typing this tonight, I look and see that my phone is still displaying “T-Mobile”, sadly. The bastardized version of Deutsche Telekom here in America remains my only viable choice, in a country that prides itself on choice and competition. I considered for a while what my alternatives were, and I came up with the following:
I compared this to the experience I’ve had in other countries – India, the Philippines, Malaysia, the Netherlands and others – where I’ve bought SIM cards and realized just how aggravating this country’s mobile phone system really is. There is no choice because the terms are the same even if the network is different, in a country that claims to have mind-boggling choices. There is no competition because there are no upstarts who can displace the reigning champion, in a country that made its reputation on the value of competition. There is no equality of treatment because you can either accept their (identical) terms or take a hike, in a country where the basic premise of the Declaration of Independence and Constitution is such equality. And heaven forbid you should try to just pay them and get on with life – how else could the dangle a guillotine over your head to point out how they are in the position of power?
I cannot help but think of two people and their writings now: Alexandre de Tocqueville and Richard Stallman. During the summer of my first year here, a good friend of mine suggested that I read “On Democracy in America” and to this date I cannot help but remember with a chill what Tocqueville wrote about being welcome to think different, but being shunned for it. And from Stallman, whom I mock and think a barrier to the healthy progress of FOSS and Linux, I am reminded of the frightening “Right to Read” which I think he might have been right about in many respects, but was wrong to attribute the blocking agent as Microsoft. The true gatekeepers of the internet and the infinite information stored there are the ISPs. As more and more access happens on the go and over the air, having open, unfettered access to the internet without ridiculous terms and limitations or threats to cut off your access means that the true menace to free (as in freedom) information are uncompetitive companies functioning as a cartel, so there are no choices.
In the meantime, of course, I await my next, inevitable letter from T-Mobile Financial informing me that I have failed to pay and face suspension of service.